The consumer Ombudsman for the ENGIE Group 2023 report
32
PROPOSING RECOMMENDATIONS
,,
.:
(),
.
Mediation process
Recommendation No. 3
Consumer energy suppliers
Improve the complaints handling process for
energy suppliers to prevent the Ombudsman from
gradually becoming a complaint handling service.
Observation
The Mediation handles a signif icant number of requests under
consumer mediation that, in practice, are complaints. However, it
has proposed expanding its eligibility criteria to provide factual
evidence of the proper functioning of ENGIE subsidiaries’ complaint
processes. In 2023, out of the 782 mediation cases received for
individuals, 30% originated from cases with no response within two
months from Customer or Consumer Services, which represents
the workload of two people in the Mediation team.
This rate has hardly decreased in 2023 (1/3 in 2022) even though
cases reaching mediation due to back-and-forth with customer
service were redirected to level 2.
Recommendation
Energy suppliers should streamline their complaints handling
procedures to prevent requests arising from unsubstantiated
complaints or failure to respond to written complaints within two
months. For instance, they could proactively of fer complainants the
option to escalate their concerns to the consumer service experts
for resolution.
Notably the consumer service at ENGIE resolves over 85 of pre
mature requests that are redirected to the Ombudsman aligning
with current regulations and the spirit of the European directive
Recommendation No. 4
ENGIE Home Services (EHS)
Agree to implement a “Method Agreement”
mediation solution that outlines the parties’
future responsibilities.
Observation
In certain cases encountered, despite EHS acknowledging respon-
sibility from the outset, the mediation process lasted for several
months. It would have been resolved in a matter of days if EHS
had promptly addressed the compensation amount following its
acknowledgment of responsibility. As a reminder, the legal guar-
antee obliges the seller to respond to hidden defects:
• without relying on a complex and slow compensation mechanism
by involving its insurer,
• without transferring to the buyer (claimant) the responsibilities
inherent in its liability (to repair or refund).
The implementation of a coverage process (liability insurance)
by EHS resulted in the neutralization of the mediation process.
While this insurance process is legitimate (within EHS’s authority),
it cannot condition the assessment of the parties’ responsibilities
in mediation or lead to the suspension of the mediation process.
Recommendation
In such cases, EHS could agree to a “method agreement” solu-
tion where the parties outline their responsibilities and def ine the
conditions for future repairs nature of work expert assessment
of compensation and presentation of evidence
The Ombudsman had proposed this solution from the outset and
ultimately it was agreed upon for future repairs EHS committed to
covering the cost of corrective work upon presentation of evidence
This method agreement should be systematically implemented
by EHS in such situations
:
•:
.
.,
,
’.
-
,
.
•-
,
,
.-
.-
.
•
:,
,
•
.
’
,,
,.
-
.
,
-
.
•
,
,
,
.
•,
,,
,
.
,
:
,
.
,
.,
,
Billing and payment
Recommendation No. 2
Consumer Division (DGP)
Accompany consumption
adjustments during the billing
cycle with detailed information
and explain complex accounting
operations.
Observation
The issue of insuf f icient prior information
regarding consumption adjustments made
during the billing cycle has been encoun-
tered repeatedly. Similarly, there have been
instances where no explanatory letter
was included with the bill during complex
accounting operations. The Ombudsman
had previously made recommendations to
the supplier on this matter.
Recommendation
The Ombudsman recommends that the
supplier provide customers with a detailed
invoice accompanied by a written or oral
explanation to ensure they understand the
reason for the bill sent during the billing
cycle.
In the case of consumption adjustments, the
written elements provided to the supplier
by the distributor, describing the action
taken, can serve as the expected expla-
nation.
Discover all the
details of our
recommendations
for 2024