34 35 CYCLEVIA
2025 ANNUAL REPORT CYCLEVIA
2025 ANNUAL REPORT
CYCLEVIA : Actions
An improved
organisation
Teams
are growing
The producer responsibility
organisation is stepping up its
human resources in key areas
f inance logistics IT QHSE A Waste
Holder Relations Manager has also
been recruited to accompany the
development of Ma collecte This
additional expertise should allow
CYCLEVIA to ensure a rigorous
and ef f icient roll out of its new
operational model
Crisis management :
a plan to prepare ahead
Following a request by its Board of Directors CYCLEVIA
drafted its crisis management plan This initiative is de
signed to respond to the evolution in the producer respon
sibility organisation s level of exposure operational deploy
ment multiplication of actions in the overseas departments
and territories hazardous waste transport sensitive data
continuity of activities or image stakes Designed as a toolbox
to anticipate make decisions and act in the event of a critical
situation the plan organises the entire chain reaction from
the detection of weak signals through to activity recovery
crisis committee technical solutions back up solutions
communication internal organisation
An extended
perimeter
to include packaging waste
On November 18
th
, 2025 , the publication
of the decree overseeing EPR in the
professional packaging sector conf irmed
an expected evolution : packaging for
mineral and synthetic oils , lubricants
and industrial oils , will be excluded from
“ Packaging ” EPR to be fully integrated
into oils and lubricants EPR . A signif icant
progress for CYCLEVIA , which had been
campaigning for it for the past two years .
The organisation has therefore seen
its perimeter extended to include
responsibility for its sector ’ s sales
packaging . This move is set to simplify
initiatives , optimise costs and align
responsibilities around a single player .
The terms and conditions of this change ,
along with the corresponding deadlines ,
will be stipulated in the specif ications
during 2026 .
99
%
compliance rate
CYCLEVIA conducted its second self - check since its
accreditation , in keeping with the regulatory obligation
to carry out a biennial audit . Carried out by D DE B
Consultants ( Cofrac accredited ) , this audit required more
than 740 justifying documents and involved 85 check
points : objectives , f inancial management , compliance
of fees , data quality , procurement , actions in the
overseas departments and territories . . . Marked by the
switch to a mixed EPR model the audit also included
new assessment components The results A rate
of compliance of 99 conf irming the solidity
of the organisation put in place by CYCLEVIA
The switch to a mixed EPR scheme ,
the forthcoming integration of the sector ’ s
sales packaging into the producer responsibility
organisation ’ s scope of responsibility ,
the reinforcement of teams thanks to new expertise ,
crisis management preparation . . .
In 2025 , CYCLEVIA consolidated its organisation
to accompany the extended scope of its missions
and its progressive development .
Going where
others don ’ t dare
to venture
Throughout its existence , CYCLEVIA
has conducted several exception -
al operations in places where con -
straints call for solutions that classic
mechanisms cannot always provide .
On Reunion Island , in the landlocked
area of the cirque de Mafate , the
producer responsibility organisation
planned a vast waste oil collection op -
eration for 2026 ; in Guyana , CYCLEVIA
launched a study to intervene in a zone
only accessible via canoe ; on Sein Is -
land in Brittany , the intervention of the
producer responsibility organisation
enabled 2 . 5 tonnes of waste oil to be
evacuated in May 2025 . These target -
ed and highly concrete actions ref lect
CYCLEVIA ’ s general interest mission : to
provide solutions where the economic
equation does not add up , but where
the impact on ecosystems makes it
essential to act .
A common voice for producer
responsibility organisations
In May 2024 , four years after the enactment of the AGEC
law , a report by the French National Assembly drew up an
initial assessment of EPR sectors , highlighting shortcomings
and results deemed insuf f icient considering the objectives set
by the government . Whilst CYCLEVIA was not directly targeted ,
this sequence of events helped to accelerate the collective
organisation of producer responsibility organisations . Against
this backdrop , these organisations came together to form the
“ Collectif des Éco - organismes ” , which CYCLEVIA joined in 2025 ,
to present a common position to the public authorities and
stakeholders . Its mission is to pool experiences , promote the
expertise of the various EPR sectors and act as a driving force
for proposals on the development of their operational frame -
work . Via this grouping , producer responsibility organisations
are looking to defend their interests , which are also those of
member producers , for every sector concerned .